Pedaling ovals makes you a more efficient rider, says absoluteBLACK’s chief scientist
Several years ago, Borut Fonda, a doctor and biomechanics researcher, decided to leave academia, having had enough of the inherent bureaucracy that then plagued his professorial life. He got what some of his scientific peers would describe as an offer of lifetime: the chance to focus on cycling, biomechanics and drive train efficiency full-time in industry, free of the persistent pressures to publish and scour for grants.
A former pro mountain biker, the offer came courtesy of absoluteBLACK the London and Poland-based designer and manufacturer of aftermarket oval chainrings to be their chief research scientist. The company had existing research to support the supposed supremacy of oval rings; his work would further substantiate their claims and focus on building a smoother pedal stroke with better bike parts.
What is a smoother pedal stroke? Does that mean more power? More efficiency? How do you quantify smoothness? Is that enough reason to swap rings?
The benefits of going oval, says Fonda, are beyond marginal - a five to nine percent decrease in energy consumption (greater metabolic efficiency) over a 200km ride. While you can’t expect a 30 watt increase in FTP by using them, Fonda boils it down like this: “metabolic efficiency is something you can’t fake. Even a one percent savings - at the professional level - can mean the difference between winning a stage race and not finishing it.” With such a massive savings at stake, we got a set of AB’s ovals to see what the fuss was about. Turns out the claims about efficiency are hard to dispute.
The great ring debate: are ovals better?
While no UCI pro teams currently race in AB’s rings, a number of pros work with the company’s fit lab, looking for efficiencies in their pedaling styles. Anecdotal feedback and Strava times, says Fonda, suggest AB rings are different from their asymmetric predecessors and a step beyond pedalling on round rings. “When someone who could potentially win a three-week stage race says they see a noticeable jump in their times on ovals, that’s another level of feedback,” he says.
Pedalling ovals won’t give you a higher FTP. What ovals do give is enhanced use of human physiology, says Fonda. While previous asymmetric rings (Shimano introduced their Biospace rings in 1983; Rotor’s QRings came roughly a decade later) took force away from the knee during a pedal stroke, AB’s innovation is to distribute pedalling force across the entire leg - hip to heel - and to maximize peak power with shapes and shifting. (Several smaller brands have since emulated this approach.)
So interesting are these rings, they appear to have reignited a debate (in our minds, anyway) as to whether or not pedaling ovals is actually advantageous. Theoretically better suited to most people’s power profiles, pedalling ovals amounts to spending less calories to turn out the same watts. If you’ve seen them up close, you’ll have seen how the ring spends more time where power is generated (as the crank rotates from 10 to 3) and less time in drivetrain “dead zones.”
The major benefit of ovals, says Fonda, is that you engage your entire leg to pedal - hip, knee, ankle and calf - the snout to tail of pedalling. (My hips were sore AF for two weeks after I started using the rings - so greater engagement confirmed.) Saying they are “better” may be entirely subjective and possibly influenced by your existing bike fit. But there are noticeable differences.
Ovals are better: ride conclusions
Absolute Black is a small company that’s smart enough to fund big ideas and their rings are growing more popular. During lockdown, sales have actually grown online (they are currently selling over one million pieces a year). Pros are anxious to race them (it’s rumoured they will supply rings to several teams in 2021).
WIth AB’s ovals, the cranks just seem to turn over easier - a purely anecdotal conclusion but an undeniable one all the same. If an aftermarket part can actually leave you with a little more gas in the legs, which these do, I’m all in. Since the rings were installed (see bike above) there is undeniably a broader muscular engagement and greater ease with cadence. As for faster times, that’s hard to qualify without doing some A/B testing against comparable round rings. I’m less fussed with that, and more focused on an ability to ride further and fresher, which ovals offer hands down.
At 170 euros for a set of premium rings, AB has cracked the cost conundrum that some critics have slapped on oval rings. They are inexpensive, awesome and an upgrade that shouldn’t be ignored.